<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing a Search Engine Optimised Press Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trevorginn.com/writing-a-search-engine-optimised-press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trevorginn.com/writing-a-search-engine-optimised-press-release/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:16:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.trevorginn.com/writing-a-search-engine-optimised-press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-63314</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trevorginn.com/?p=390#comment-63314</guid>
		<description>Informative post for anyone unfamiliar with the difference between traditional press releases and search engine optimized ones.

However, I&#039;d have to disagree on a couple of points:

* Keyword percentage should always be between 2-4% for maximum effect - anything more than that will just appear spammy. It&#039;ll probably read like it was made specifically for SEO purposes as well, as opposed to an actual press release.

* You should have a sub-header in-between the main headline and the press release body. This is ideal for grabbing your target audience even more (after a strong lead-in headline). Too often people confuse a summary with a sub-header.

Otherwise, good info. Additionally, you can use your press release URL to include two of your optimized keywords.

Although the free press release sites you mention are okay and do a decent enough job, I&#039;d also always recommend using a service like the $200 SEO Visibility package from PRWeb - I&#039;ve had excellent results from my clients using this package.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Informative post for anyone unfamiliar with the difference between traditional press releases and search engine optimized ones.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;d have to disagree on a couple of points:</p>
<p>* Keyword percentage should always be between 2-4% for maximum effect &#8211; anything more than that will just appear spammy. It&#8217;ll probably read like it was made specifically for SEO purposes as well, as opposed to an actual press release.</p>
<p>* You should have a sub-header in-between the main headline and the press release body. This is ideal for grabbing your target audience even more (after a strong lead-in headline). Too often people confuse a summary with a sub-header.</p>
<p>Otherwise, good info. Additionally, you can use your press release URL to include two of your optimized keywords.</p>
<p>Although the free press release sites you mention are okay and do a decent enough job, I&#8217;d also always recommend using a service like the $200 SEO Visibility package from PRWeb &#8211; I&#8217;ve had excellent results from my clients using this package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
