<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eBay Feedback 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trevorginn.com/ebay-feedback-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trevorginn.com/ebay-feedback-20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.trevorginn.com/ebay-feedback-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1820</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 04:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trevorginn.com/ebay-feedback-20/#comment-1820</guid>
		<description>The implementation schema for feedback 2.0 is a farce.

If the ratings were confidential and left as a tool for sellers to evaluate their own performance and customers perspectives it would be great. However, allowing someone to post anonymous ratings which are then displayed to the public does nothing but breed anonymous cowards who are free to crucify a seller and walk away without having to justify an adverse rating. To further facilitate this farce eBay refuses to provide a rating of buyers, including those who use the feedback process as retaliation when a seller refuses to hunker down to the types of extortion that are attempted regularly in the ebay venue.

Given the fact that Bay itself is responsible for the creation of the rating system and categories, it will do little more than allow ebay to brow beat and force  sellers int o complying with eBay&#039;s corporate interests while using the buyers to accomplish the tasks. 

How about a public rating of eBay and Paypal after every transaction... How good would that be for the proverbial goose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The implementation schema for feedback 2.0 is a farce.</p>
<p>If the ratings were confidential and left as a tool for sellers to evaluate their own performance and customers perspectives it would be great. However, allowing someone to post anonymous ratings which are then displayed to the public does nothing but breed anonymous cowards who are free to crucify a seller and walk away without having to justify an adverse rating. To further facilitate this farce eBay refuses to provide a rating of buyers, including those who use the feedback process as retaliation when a seller refuses to hunker down to the types of extortion that are attempted regularly in the ebay venue.</p>
<p>Given the fact that Bay itself is responsible for the creation of the rating system and categories, it will do little more than allow ebay to brow beat and force  sellers int o complying with eBay&#8217;s corporate interests while using the buyers to accomplish the tasks. </p>
<p>How about a public rating of eBay and Paypal after every transaction&#8230; How good would that be for the proverbial goose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountie</title>
		<link>http://www.trevorginn.com/ebay-feedback-20/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trevorginn.com/ebay-feedback-20/#comment-923</guid>
		<description>The big problem is exactly what you said but with ONE glaring error &quot;Nobody will bother to complete the new metrics&quot;..... except those that have had a bad buying experience when they&#039;ll take the opportunity to hammer the seller. Just consider Amazon where hardly anyone bothers to leave feedback except when they want to complain! Another indication that eBay haven&#039;t a clue how this will play out is Bill Cobbs assurance to US sellers that it would be tested in other countries before before the US so they don&#039;t have to worry that they&#039;re feedback will be affected. Well thanks Cobb - shows just what you think of the UK and other countries sellers that you&#039;re happy to mess around and test on their feedback. More info on &lt;a href=&quot;http://tamebay.pobox.co.uk/2007/01/feedback-wasnt-broke-so-they-fixed-it.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tamebay&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big problem is exactly what you said but with ONE glaring error &#8220;Nobody will bother to complete the new metrics&#8221;&#8230;.. except those that have had a bad buying experience when they&#8217;ll take the opportunity to hammer the seller. Just consider Amazon where hardly anyone bothers to leave feedback except when they want to complain! Another indication that eBay haven&#8217;t a clue how this will play out is Bill Cobbs assurance to US sellers that it would be tested in other countries before before the US so they don&#8217;t have to worry that they&#8217;re feedback will be affected. Well thanks Cobb &#8211; shows just what you think of the UK and other countries sellers that you&#8217;re happy to mess around and test on their feedback. More info on <a href="http://tamebay.pobox.co.uk/2007/01/feedback-wasnt-broke-so-they-fixed-it.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/tamebay.pobox.co.uk');">Tamebay</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

